Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
茂木 孝介; Trianti, N.; 松本 俊慶; 杉山 智之; 丸山 結
Proceedings of 18th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-18) (USB Flash Drive), p.4324 - 4335, 2019/08
Hydrogen managements under severe accidents are one of the most crucial problems and have attracted a great deal of attention after the occurrence of hydrogen explosions in the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in March 2011. The primary purpose of our research is improvements in computational fluid dynamics techniques to simulate hydrogen combustion. Our target of analysis is ENACCEF2 hydrogen combustion benchmark test conducted in the framework of ETOSON-MITHYGENE project. Flame acceleration experiments of hydrogen premixed turbulent combustions were simulated by the Turbulent Flame Closure (TFC) model. We implemented several laminar flame speed correlations and turbulent flame speed models on XiFoam solver of OpenFOAM and compared the results to investigate the applicability of these correlation and model equations. We found that all the laminar flame speed correlations could predict qualitative behavior of the flame acceleration, but Ravi & Petersen laminar flame speed correlation that is originally implemented in OpenFOAM underestimated the maximum flame speed for the lean hydrogen concentration. Zimont model and Glder model of the turbulent flame speed could reasonably simulate the flame acceleration behavior and maximum pressure peaks. The flame velocities calculated with Glder model tend to be faster than that calculated with Zimont model.
Thwe Thwe, A.; 寺田 敦彦; 日野 竜太郎
no journal, ,
高レベル放射性含水廃棄物容器中に水素が継続的に発生しているので、水素の燃焼と爆発の危険性について注意する必要がある。水素安全管理においては、実験的な研究に加え、火炎伝播現象の予測におけるCFDアプローチは重要な役割を果たしている。そこで、放射性廃棄物容器中の水素燃焼へのアプローチとして、オープンソースソフトウェア、OpenFOAMを用いて、水素-空気予混合火炎伝播シミュレーションを行った。勝身ら[長岡技術科学大学]による水素-空気爆発実験から導き出された新しい層流火炎速度モデルをXiFoamソルバーに実装したシミュレーションでは、実験と同じく火炎が外側に広がったときにしわ状火炎が形成され、シミュレーションから得られた球状火炎半径は実験結果と0.005秒以内の差でよく一致した。